On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 4:08 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 2:51 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I see the problem but I wonder why you didn't consider using
> > rd_opcintype stored in index relation to solve this problem. I have
> > tried the attached atop v79-0001 and v79-0002, manually executed the
> > test you shared in this email and it fixed the issue for me.
>
> Yeah you can do that, but if we directly fetch the heap attribute and
> then value from the slot like I have done in my 0003 patch you can get
> rid of all the processing done inside build_index_datums_from_slot()
> i.e. calling FormIndexDatum(BuildIndexInfo) etc. If you see my patch
> with that I am able to remove all this extra processing, I am sure we
> can get rid of that by some other way as well but I think thats the
> most obvious way of doing it.
>
I was looking from the code consistency point of view. We already used
this idea in build_index_value_desc() code path while reporting the
conflict in LOG, so it looks natural to use the same idea here. Also,
as this is a path where conflict already happened and we decided to
insert into conflict_history_table, so the performance will anyway be
not the main concern, so we can consider this optimization separately.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
