On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 6:50 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At Mon, 28 Feb 2022 21:03:07 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote in
> > Hi,
> >
> > It looks like we use "log segment" in various user-facing messages.
> > The term "log" can mean server logs as well. The "WAL segment" suits
> > well here and it is consistently used across the other user-facing
> > messages [1].
> >
> > Here's a small patch attempting to consistently use the "WAL segment".
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> I tend to agree to this.
Thanks for taking a look at it. Here's the CF entry -
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3584/
> I also see "log record(s)" (without prefixed
> by "write-ahead") in many places especially in the documentation. I'm
> not sure how we should treat "WAL log", though.
Yes, but the docs have a glossary term for 'Log record" [1]. FWIW
attaching docs change as v2-0002 patch. I found another place where
"log records" is being used in pg_waldump.c, I changed that and
attached v2-0001 patch.
Please review the v2 patch set.
[1]
<glossentry id="glossary-log-record">
<glossterm>Log record</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>
Archaic term for a <glossterm linkend="glossary-wal-record">WAL
record</glossterm>.
</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
