Re: Anyone using silent_mode? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vick Khera
Subject Re: Anyone using silent_mode?
Date
Msg-id CALd+dcfG3YN+bytVsM12LxQhvzMJqhimQzpGH7DTJMeJCc7FWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Anyone using silent_mode?  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Is anyone using silent_mode=on ? There's some discussion on pgsql-hackers
> [1] on whether it should be removed altogether in 9.2, since you can get the
> same functionality with "pg_ctl start", or nohup. If you're using
> silent_mode, what are you using it for?

I run with slient_mode=on since all my logging goes to syslog. I don't
need any other output from postgres.  I've run this way since 7.1.

I run on FreeBSD so I don't have that OOM killer problem.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alban Hertroys
Date:
Subject: Re: Unexpected results when joining on date fields
Next
From: Wim Bertels
Date:
Subject: psql feature request