Re: pgbench and scaling - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vick Khera
Subject Re: pgbench and scaling
Date
Msg-id CALd+dceTuux3UOQ=9nEpMF8PVf3_SYbiqcXxQzPSBcFKD-tzpg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pgbench and scaling  (Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464@outlook.com>)
Responses Re: pgbench and scaling  (rakeshkumar464 <rakeshkumar464@outlook.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Rakesh Kumar
<rakeshkumar464@outlook.com> wrote:
> I noticed that as I scale from 5 to 10 to 20 to 40, the TPS starts falling almost linearly :
>
> with 5, TPS was doing 639
> with 10 TPS was down to 490
> with 20 TPS was down to 280
> and so on.

Are the TPS numbers per pgbench? If so, then you're getting
10x490=4900 TPS system wide, or 20*280=5600 TPS system wide.

If those are total TPS numbers then you should check your disk
utilization and CPU utilization and see where your bottleneck is.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming replication failover/failback
Next
From: William Ivanski
Date:
Subject: Re: Trim performance on 9.5