Re: warm standby replication safe failover - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Andrew Puschak
Subject Re: warm standby replication safe failover
Date
Msg-id CALFZoBu6RNvFeiqwgmaurqNjqdqteKCZWJ+z2eJkzuH4oE1=4Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: warm standby replication safe failover  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: warm standby replication safe failover  (Andrew Puschak <apuschak@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-novice
Thanks Tom!

The PostgreSQL 8.4 is coming from the default latest CentOS 6.3 updates repository which makes it an easy install and upgrade later (yum install postgresql-server). I'll try installing/upgrading my test setup using http://yum.postgresql.org repository. I'm also going to need to find out what migrating to a newer version will affect with the current production data.
Andrew


On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Andrew Puschak <apuschak@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm new here and have a question. I'm working on a replacement PostgreSQL
> 8.4 setup for a small company. They now have a Primary postgres server and
> 2 secondaries which are replicated using Slony-I, however the consulting
> company that set it up is afraid to failover and keeping Slony running is
> taking lots of resources.

It sounds like you're trying to keep them on 8.4.  Why not move them to
some newer release branch where you can make use of streaming
replication?  Aside from the benefits of that, 8.4 will be out of
support next year, so setting up new servers with that release series
seems pretty short-sighted.

I realize that dealing with a version upgrade might not be their highest
priority right now, but they're going to have to deal with it before too
long, and doing so now would put them in position to have a far better
replication solution than what you're describing.

                        regards, tom lane



--
Andrew Puschak
(267) 614 - 2373
apuschak@gmail.com
http://andrewpuschak.com

pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: warm standby replication safe failover
Next
From: Andrew Puschak
Date:
Subject: Re: warm standby replication safe failover