Re: Replication slot stats misgivings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm3yBctNFE6X2FV_haRF4uue9okm1_DVE6ZANWvOV_CvYw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Replication slot stats misgivings  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:46 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 1:13 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 3:22 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > Thank you for updating the patch.
> >
> > I have one question on the doc change:
> >
> > +        so the counter is not incremented for subtransactions. Note that this
> > +        includes the transactions streamed and or spilled.
> > +       </para></entry>
> >
> > The patch uses the sentence "streamed and or spilled" in two places.
> > You meant “streamed and spilled”? Even if it actually means “and or”,
> > using "and or” (i.g., connecting “and” to “or” by a space) is general?
> > I could not find we use it other places in the doc but found we're
> > using "and/or" instead.
> >
>
> I changed it to 'and/or' and made another minor change.

I have rebased the remaining patches on top of head. Attached the
patches for the same.
Thoughts?

Regards,
Vignesh

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: Retry in pgbench