Re: Replication slot stats misgivings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JbUeJKWcMdM2rkvsc_mp5a8-uSbgBFXQjJAc-WHkvN6A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Replication slot stats misgivings  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 1:13 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 3:22 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> Thank you for updating the patch.
>
> I have one question on the doc change:
>
> +        so the counter is not incremented for subtransactions. Note that this
> +        includes the transactions streamed and or spilled.
> +       </para></entry>
>
> The patch uses the sentence "streamed and or spilled" in two places.
> You meant “streamed and spilled”? Even if it actually means “and or”,
> using "and or” (i.g., connecting “and” to “or” by a space) is general?
> I could not find we use it other places in the doc but found we're
> using "and/or" instead.
>

I changed it to 'and/or' and made another minor change.


--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: shawn wang
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Next
From: Luc Vlaming
Date:
Subject: Re: "could not find pathkey item to sort" for TPC-DS queries 94-96