Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm3Z0sti4R7PuD0npA7tQoWRwK8dAh=QxWf+nU0ZGC=_Ww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 at 13:47, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On 08.12.22 03:30, Peter Smith wrote:
> > PSA patches for v9*
> >
> > v9-0001 - Now the table rows are ordered per PeterE's suggestions [1]
>
> committed
>
> > v9-0002 - All the review comments from DavidJ [2] are addressed
>
> I'm not sure about this one.  It removes the "see [link] for details"
> phrases and instead makes the view name a link.  I think this loses the
> cue that there is more information elsewhere.  Otherwise, one could
> think that, say, the entry about pg_stat_activity is the primary source
> and the link just links to itself.  Also keep in mind that people use
> media where links are not that apparent (PDF), so the presence of a link
> by itself cannot be the only cue about the flow of the information.

I'm not sure if anything is pending for v9-0003, if there is something
pending, please post an updated patch for the same.

Regards,
Vignesh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: Ignore dropped columns when checking the column list in logical replication
Next
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: Add SHELL_EXIT_CODE to psql