Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm3V5DQSbZGxhYH+3MMMm-YdgOg+RdJ-ni6D0TZx_=Xd7w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands  (stephane tachoires <stephane.tachoires@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 21:08, Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>
> Hi, Alexander!
> Thanks for your advices and recommendations!
>
>  >I don't think we need a separate 0003 patch with refactoring.  It's
>  >probably good idea to keep this functionality as a separate patch, but
>  >let's make then it a 0001, which prepares functions used by 0002 and
>  >0003.
>
> Done. 0003 was created separately to better understand what changes were
> made after the verified changes 0001 and 0002.
>
>  >Please, check my thoughts on how this patch could be further
>  >developed.  Given amount of work to be done, I doubt that'a a subject
>  >for pg18.  But I think you could continue this work, and we could
>  >consider it for early pg19 cycle.
>
> Good. I'll try to collect and summarize the opinions of colleagues on
> these issues [1], and then put them up for discussion in this thread.

I noticed that Alvaro's comments from [1] have not yet been addressed,
I have changed the status of commitfest entry to "Waiting on Author",
please address them and update it to "Needs review".
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202502031640.zem6orjmmxoz@alvherre.pgsql

Regards,
Vignesh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt