On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 9:38 AM Greg Nancarrow <
gregn4422@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 1:42 PM
houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> <
houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > Personally, the new name pg_publication_sch is not very easy to understand.
> > (Maybe it's because I am not a native english speaker. If others feel ok,
> > please ignore this comment)
> >
>
> I was actually thinking the same thing.
> I prefer the full SCHEMA/schema, even for all the internal
> variables/definitions which have been changed since the last patch
> version.
> I think Vignesh was trying to be consistent with pg_publication_rel
> and pg_subscription_rel, but maybe "rel" is better understood to be an
> abbreviation for "relation" than "sch" for "schema"?
> Thoughts from others?
I have changed it to pg_pubication_schema as earlier as both you and Houzj San felt pg_publication_schema was better. This is fixed in the v14 patch attached at [1].
[1] -
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm3DTj535ezfmm8QHLOtOkcHF2ZcCfSjfR%3DVbTbLZXFRsA%40mail.gmail.com
Regards,
Vignesh
