On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 18:54, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 18:10, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hmm, this problem isn't limited to this one pg_upgrade test, right? It
> > could happen with any pg_upgrade invocation. And perhaps in a running
> > server too, if a relfilenumber is reused quickly. In dropdb() and
> > DropTableSpace() we do this:
> >
> > WaitForProcSignalBarrier(EmitProcSignalBarrier(PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_SMGRRELEASE));
> >
> > Should we do the same here? Not sure where exactly to put that; perhaps
> > in mdcreate(), if the creation fails with STATUS_DELETE_PENDING.
>
> How about a patch similar to the attached one? I have run pg_upgrade
> tests multiple times, but unfortunately, I was unable to reproduce the
> issue or verify these changes.
CFBot reported an issue in one of the machines, here is an updated
version for the same.
Regards,
Vignesh
