Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm0Wz0M----FPjRmPk3ifhffD-MxpajZX5EVYN=1gOFCQw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:26 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
>
> rebased to appease cfbot.
>
> + couple of little fixes as 0002.

Thanks for rebasing and fixing a few issues. I have taken all your
changes except for mcxtfuncs changes as those changes were not done as
part of this patch. Attached v19 patch which has the changes for the
same.

Regards,
Vignesh

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Imseih (AWS), Sami"
Date:
Subject: Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical replication - schema change not invalidating the relation cache