Re: Log prefix missing for subscriber log messages received from publisher - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Log prefix missing for subscriber log messages received from publisher
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm0D6Acx1v-t2cZLumRJoRDT+ZBY4P1S_zh2kdcX4_Ph3Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Log prefix missing for subscriber log messages received from publisher  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: Log prefix missing for subscriber log messages received from publisher
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 at 04:46, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2025/07/18 1:15, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2025-Jul-18, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >
> >> The current patches add nearly identical notice_receiver functions
> >> in multiple places such as libpqwalreceiver.c and elsewhere. To avoid
> >> duplicating the same logic, could we define a shared notice receiver
> >> function in a common file, like libpq-be-fe-helpers.h, and use it in
> >> all three locations?
> >
> > I like the idea of reducing duplication.  I don't like the "prefix"
> > as proposed though, because it's not going to work well for translation
> > (string building) -- I'd rather pass the entire phrase from caller, so
> > that the translator has one piece to translate which lives in the module
> > that emits it.  I think I'd do something like
> >
> >      ereport(LOG,
> >              errmsg_internal("%s: %.*s",
> >                           _(prefix), len, message));
> >
> > and see to it that each caller uses gettext_noop() around the string
> > they pass as "arg", for gettext to collect.
>
> Agreed. Thanks!

The attached v6 version patch has the changes for these comments.

Regards,
Vignesh

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let's get rid of the freelist and the buffer_strategy_lock
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Out-of-Order NOTIFY via GUC to Improve LISTEN/NOTIFY Throughput