Re: Schemas vs partitioning vs multiple databases for archiving - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Chris Travers
Subject Re: Schemas vs partitioning vs multiple databases for archiving
Date
Msg-id CAKt_Zfu4qKgfBF_YPd9V37Qdw7CNRSQL5vV9ShVQ=Gx1rQxedA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Schemas vs partitioning vs multiple databases for archiving  (Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>)
Responses Re: Schemas vs partitioning vs multiple databases for archiving  (Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>)
List pgsql-general


On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz> wrote:
On 18/08/12 20:05, Bartel Viljoen wrote:
[...]

I’m in the design faze of a new GUI and DB layout, what are my options.

[...]
I think you meant phase! 
(Spell checkers can be quite stupid!)

Could be worse....  See the post here entitled "When Spellcheckers Attack."


Best Wishes,
Chris Travers 


Cheers,
Gavin



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: Schemas vs partitioning vs multiple databases for archiving
Next
From: Dmitriy Igrishin
Date:
Subject: Re: Views versus user-defined functions: formatting, comments, performance, etc.