Re: Subplan result caching - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andy Fan
Subject Re: Subplan result caching
Date
Msg-id CAKU4AWqNx4940XDkJL101Fb0SsycZ6nn=-fAVvrrzrOAF5gLng@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Subplan result caching  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:47 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 00:37, Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was feeling that we may have to maintain some extra status if we use hash
> table rather than tuple store, but that might be not a major concern.  I can
> wait and see your patch.

I've posted the patch and lots of details about it in
https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrPcQyQdWERGYWx8J+2DLUNgXu+fOSbQ1UscxrunyXyrQ@mail.gmail.com


Amazing!  I will start to study it today. 
 
--
Best Regards
Andy Fan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan vs kernel read ahead
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimizer docs typos