Re: Subplan result caching - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Subplan result caching
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvrTgUP4g4j=n2FfUBK_KwZ2azxSFrVa28gzs7vteEa+pw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Subplan result caching  (Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Subplan result caching
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 00:37, Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was feeling that we may have to maintain some extra status if we use hash
> table rather than tuple store, but that might be not a major concern.  I can
> wait and see your patch.

I've posted the patch and lots of details about it in
https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrPcQyQdWERGYWx8J+2DLUNgXu+fOSbQ1UscxrunyXyrQ@mail.gmail.com

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
Next
From: David Gilman
Date:
Subject: Re: Warn when parallel restoring a custom dump without data offsets