Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f_yO3nytivqsMQMnyOMG6vU6FOMdz8HLqispEY+eApLOg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward fasterpartition pruning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 30 November 2017 at 11:15, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Committed 0004 after reviewing the code and testing that it seems to
> work as advertised.
>
> 0005 looks like it might need to be split into smaller patches.  More
> broadly, the commit messages you wrote for for 0005, 0006, and 0008
> don't seem to me to do a great job explaining the motivation for the
> changes which they make.  They tell me what the patches do, but not
> why they are doing it.  If there's an email in this thread that
> explains that stuff, please point me to it and I'll go back and reread
> it more carefully; if not, I think I definitely need some more
> explanation both of the mission of each patch and the reason why the
> patch set is divided up in the way that it is.

Hi Amit,

It looks like just 0005 to 0008 remain of this and I see that the v13
0005 patch no longer applies to current master.

Are you working on splitting this up as requested by Robert above?

I can continue reviewing this once patches are available that apply to
current master.

Many thanks

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Next
From: Beena Emerson
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning