Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f9ZFU3kgE81ixYV+D3MD5DOaRqFa9S3+UTz-36QNN1HfA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 31 March 2018 at 02:00, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 31 March 2018 at 01:18, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> I've noticed that there are no outfuncs or readfuncs for all the new
>> Step types you've added.
>>
>> Also, the copy func does not properly copy the step_id in the base
>> node type. This will remain at 0 after a copyObject()
>
> Attaching it as it may save you some time from doing it yourself.
> Please check it though.

The attached might be slightly easier to apply. The previous version
was based on top of some other changes I'd been making.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)