Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f8f8+3FOBhSoopo15uzHsY76+L8cMKhMwBi+x+bvBU7tg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees
List pgsql-hackers
On 3 July 2018 at 16:55, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Okay, the patch looks logically correct to me, I just tweaked the
> comments as per the attached.  I would also back-patch that down to v11
> to keep the code consistent with HEAD..  What do you think?

Thanks for fixing it up. It looks fine apart from "Temporation" should
be "Temporary".

I think it should be backpatched to v11 and v10. Your original commit
went there too. I don't see any reason to do any different here than
what you did with the original commit.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible bug in logical replication.
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?