Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f-YegKnofC-0WwZhcabVVwvX8=D==5sHrZrM3SiGm8LWA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 10 May 2018 at 16:13, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> The patch to ExecInsert looks good, but I think we also need to do the
> same thing in CopyFrom.

I think so too.

Updated patch attached.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?