Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwbC+3Vk5EJsEiUCtLdORE2-Jq-J8+xAUG5fV2-nkP3r3A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions  (Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, 12:56 Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com> wrote:

What I am saying is n_ins_since_vacuum should not account for aborted inserts.

It does and from what I can see it should.  You need to explain why it should not.  More importantly, convincingly enough to change five year old behavior.

You should get away from showing counts and talk about system behavior.  Or, if this is accounting related, explain the math.

David J.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions