Re: dblink Future support vs FDW - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: dblink Future support vs FDW
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwamArNEe-EVA-sVVLuerJ4EWt54wkZWRApobCE1yi360Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to dblink Future support vs FDW  (Dhritman Roy <dhritman.roy@NetCracker.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thursday, June 27, 2024, Dhritman Roy <dhritman.roy@netcracker.com> wrote: 

This is my attempt to seek support at PostGreSQL.So, if I have broken any protocols/rules or violated any code of conduct then please do forgive and guide me. Thanks.


The G is not capitalized.
 

I know we can use FDW but our teams are right now considering dblink ( it seems it is more performant when compared to FDW ) and we obviously do not want to end up in a situation where we develop something in few months and then we find that the PostGreSQL support is ending with a new version.

 
There is no deprecation note and they have co-existed for years now.  Lacking the former, it isn’t going to just be removed for no reason, and there presently exists no reason to remove it.  I cannot predict the future though.  But IME it is exceedingly unlikely to happen.

David J.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: A way to optimize sql about the last temporary-related row
Next
From: "agharta82@gmail.com"
Date:
Subject: Re: A way to optimize sql about the last temporary-related row