Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwZCskTXyae_rXVL3jHRsGBvE25LGaSAdOD3a_M_wdLDbQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:13 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
As discussed in the thread at [1], I've been working on redesigning
the tables we use to present SQL functions and operators.  The
first installment of that is now up; see tables 9.30 and 9.31 at

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-datetime.html

and table 9.33 at

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-enum.html

 
The centering of the headers doesn't do it for me.  Too much gap and the data itself is not centered so there is a large disconnect between the headers and the values.

The run-on aspect of the left-aligned setup is of some concern but maybe just adding some left padding to the second column - and right padding to the first - can provide the desired negative space without adding so much as to break usability.

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Date:
Subject: Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019
Next
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019