Re: PostgreSQL 9.6 behavior change with set returning (funct).* - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 9.6 behavior change with set returning (funct).*
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwYz8dwycyycveNUiH1RVRaMVdDPKdpNF_n1_KAB2=J9Wg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 9.6 behavior change with set returning (funct).*  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL 9.6 behavior change with set returning (funct).*
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

​​
In the meantime I suppose there's a case to be made for preserving
bug compatibility as much as possible.

So anyway the question is whether to commit the attached or not.

​+1 for commit - I'll trust Tom on the quality of the patch :)

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.6 behavior change with set returning (funct).*
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.6 behavior change with set returning (funct).*