Re: PostgreSQL 9.6 behavior change with set returning (funct).* - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 9.6 behavior change with set returning (funct).*
Date
Msg-id 20160323220527.GT3127@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 9.6 behavior change with set returning (funct).*  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
* David G. Johnston (david.g.johnston@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > In the meantime I suppose there's a case to be made for preserving
> > bug compatibility as much as possible.
> >
> > So anyway the question is whether to commit the attached or not.
>
> +1 for commit - I'll trust Tom on the quality of the patch :)

I'm not going to object to it.  All-in-all, I suppose '+0' from me.

Thanks!

Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.6 behavior change with set returning (funct).*
Next
From: Gilles Darold
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function