"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > Is the nuance that in reality a non-superuser cannot specify BypassRLS even > if the effective value is unchanged unimportant here?
I was wondering about that. You could definitely make a case for a weaker set of rules here. However, the superuser restriction has been like that for 15-ish years without much complaint, so it doesn't seem that it bothers people in practice.
Agreed that the behavior seems fine to keep. Was more about the documentation saying "change" instead of "specify".
