It doesn't seem possible to get through to you. Whatever you spent those one million dollars on, it sure as hell wasn't related to pgAdmin in any way. More like very heavy drugs, if you think this is even acceptable for pre-pre-pre-alpha software. It's literally *unusable*. You get it? UNUSABLE. Anyone who claims otherwise must have something wrong in their head.
Are you just going to keep on this charade or actually fix the problem? Do I have to switch from PostgreSQL to something else just because the admin tool is broken beyond the point of being usable to anyone? This is insanity.
There isn't a monopoly on GUI admin software for PostgresSQL. While it has its quirks I find PostgreSQL Maestro to be quite functional for my needs - at least the ones I don't solve by writing scripts and executing them via psql. The server is going to function the same no matter which external administration/client tools you choose to use.
I rarely used pgAdmin3, I found it to be "too graphical" if that makes sense, and haven't tried pgAdmin4. My scanning of this mailing list leads me to believe what you are saying is reasonably accurate even if your tone is not: there are a number of active discussions on this very topic on this mailing list right now.
