Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwYJd2yaWNR6eJqGtgJG5ehy+ScwpwAhzToSFp1ipBq=qw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade  (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:04 PM Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote:
but have not found a combination of name/args for genome_threshold_mono(text,text,double precision)


Per the fine documentation:

\df[anptwS+] [ pattern [ arg_pattern ... ] ]

So the correct formulation is:

\df genome_threshold_mono text text 'double precision'

You need to quote the fourth argument to protect the embedded space as a character and not an argument separator.

David J.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rob Sargent
Date:
Subject: Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade