Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade
Date
Msg-id 1799103.1650057624@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade  (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm about to unleash new versions of the above and related functions 
> (args will change), so a drops are imminent. Any reason to hold off on that?

While I've not yet looked at the code, I've got no reason to think
this is anything except fragile argument parsing in \df and \sf.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade