On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
Do we already assume that default btree opclass for array element type matches PK opclass when using @>> operator on UPDATE/DELETE of referenced table?
I believe so, since it's a polymorphic function.
If so, we don't introduce additional restriction here...
You mean to remove the wrapper query ?
GROUP BY would also use default btree/hash opclass for element type. It doesn't differ from DISTINCT from that point.
