Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VSquery mean time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Haribabu Kommi
Subject Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VSquery mean time
Date
Msg-id CAJrrPGfrdBi6OwjSFxvWXnYK27PykrPXpq_Q6zw9krXbfgctoQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VSquery mean time  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:32 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:51 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 7:54 AM Jamison, Kirk <k.jamison@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > So I am marking this thread as “Ready for Committer”.
> >
>
> Thanks, Hari and Jamison for verification.  The patches for
> back-branches looks good to me.  I will once again verify them before
> commit. I will commit this patch tomorrow unless someone has
> objections.  Robert/Alvaro, do let me know if you see any problem with
> this fix?
>

Pushed.

Thanks Amit.
Will look into it further to handle all the internally generated transactions.

Regards,
Haribabu Kommi
Fujitsu Australia

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: bug in update tuple routing with foreign partitions
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector