Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VSquery mean time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VSquery mean time
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LoLSjmjZJVEm1hc+RmG5PyFbcpezaXSnA95VycrQFb_w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VSquery mean time  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VSquery mean time
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:51 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 7:54 AM Jamison, Kirk <k.jamison@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > So I am marking this thread as “Ready for Committer”.
> >
>
> Thanks, Hari and Jamison for verification.  The patches for
> back-branches looks good to me.  I will once again verify them before
> commit. I will commit this patch tomorrow unless someone has
> objections.  Robert/Alvaro, do let me know if you see any problem with
> this fix?
>

Pushed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with default partition pruning