Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Haribabu Kommi
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max
Date
Msg-id CAJrrPGeuVMhJQjLHV7uboZHh7uOtgPSWjxeTZ3ktKf5c-jTUJA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max  (Asif Naeem <anaeem.it@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-06-04 10:37:48 +1000, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
>> Thanks for the test. Patch is re-based to the latest head.
>
> Did you look at the source of the conflict? Did you intentionally mark
> the functions as leakproof and reviewed that that truly is the case? Or
> was that caused by copy & paste?

Yes it is copy & paste mistake. I didn't know much about that parameter.
Thanks for the information. I changed it.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: tests for client programs
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: slotname vs slot_name