Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Haribabu Kommi
Subject Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch
Date
Msg-id CAJrrPGc_i_uiRMrgWTByjPkQjbUXWmFU=XqtWaL=JsHBsZyBVQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
> The added regression test fails for the cases where the server is loaded
> with
> different pg_hba.conf rules during installcheck verification. Updated patch
> is
> attached with removing those tests.

That's not a full review as I just glanced at this patch a couple of seconds...

 #include "utils/guc.h"
+#include "utils/jsonb.h"
 #include "utils/lsyscache.h"
You don't need to include this header when using arrays.

Thanks for the review. Fixed in the updated patch with
additional error messages are also added. 
 
Implementing a test case is possible as well using the TAP
infrastructure. You may want to look at it and help folks testing the
patch more easily with a set of configurations in pg_hba.conf that
cover a maximum of code paths in your patch.

Added a tap test under src/test folder to cover maximum code changes. 

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Dynamic shared memory areas
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reload SSL certificates on SIGHUP