Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqT7wgK96JUsiFANE1EHreCV68_gArrVGJeMnkNtzQ3Dpw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
> The added regression test fails for the cases where the server is loaded
> with
> different pg_hba.conf rules during installcheck verification. Updated patch
> is
> attached with removing those tests.

That's not a full review as I just glanced at this patch a couple of seconds...
#include "utils/guc.h"
+#include "utils/jsonb.h"#include "utils/lsyscache.h"
You don't need to include this header when using arrays.

Implementing a test case is possible as well using the TAP
infrastructure. You may want to look at it and help folks testing the
patch more easily with a set of configurations in pg_hba.conf that
cover a maximum of code paths in your patch.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's get rid of SPI_push/SPI_pop