Which wrong?
1.I got no money to buy a good machine to run both the services and databas=
e.
2.I got no money to buy a good machine to run both the services and
client applications.
3.Client applications hard-coding "localhost".
4.PG hard-coding "localhost".
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 15:16, Robert Young <yayooo@gmail.com> wrote:
> But...database and other services are not relevant.
> And...client apps of course relevant to that services,but I have to
> kluge to separate the increasing load.
> And...client apps is just as same as PG hard-coding "localhost".
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 15:00, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>> Excerpts from Robert Young's message of vie oct 28 11:47:14 -0300 2011:
>>>> I just migrate some services from one machine to another but database
>>>> stay there.
>>>> So, I think the most simple solution is to change =E2=80=9Clocalhost=
=E2=80=9D point to
>>>> the new one, so that I need no modification of client applications.
>>>> But found PG gave warnings.
>>
>>> I'm surprised that your conclusion was that the path of least resistance
>>> was submitting a patch to Postgres. =C2=A0Surely patching the apps woul=
d have
>>> been a lot easier.
>>
>> The fundamental problem with that kluge (and yes, it's a kluge) is that
>> it supposes that you migrated EVERY local service to the other machine.
>> Which, obviously, you did not.
>>
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0regards, tom lane
>>
>
