Re: Avoiding Refreezing XIDs Repeatedly - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Matheus de Oliveira
Subject Re: Avoiding Refreezing XIDs Repeatedly
Date
Msg-id CAJghg4LziRUuHKhuiqLjW0fuoop6kZA_CSuqx+=ZrU7gyuwKhw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Avoiding Refreezing XIDs Repeatedly  (bkrug <bkrug@usatech.com>)
Responses Re: Avoiding Refreezing XIDs Repeatedly
List pgsql-performance

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:45 PM, bkrug <bkrug@usatech.com> wrote:
Should the relfrozenxid of pg_class then equal 2 for very old and already
vacuumed tables? Because that is not what I am seeing.

hm... You meant in the entire table? Like an static table?

Then no, it is done tuple by tuple only. In older versions (I think up to 9.2) it was setting xmin column to 2.

Regards,
--
Matheus de Oliveira
Analista de Banco de Dados
Dextra Sistemas - MPS.Br nível F!
www.dextra.com.br/postgres

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoiding Refreezing XIDs Repeatedly
Next
From: bkrug
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoiding Refreezing XIDs Repeatedly