Re: Avoiding Refreezing XIDs Repeatedly - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From bkrug
Subject Re: Avoiding Refreezing XIDs Repeatedly
Date
Msg-id 1423507553954-5837247.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Avoiding Refreezing XIDs Repeatedly  (Matheus de Oliveira <matioli.matheus@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Avoiding Refreezing XIDs Repeatedly
Re: Avoiding Refreezing XIDs Repeatedly
List pgsql-performance
Matheus de Oliveira wrote
> It changed in recent versions (9.3 or 9.4, I don't recall exactly which)
> and moved to tuple header, but what you described is exactly what was
> done,
> the xid was 2.

Should the relfrozenxid of pg_class then equal 2 for very old and already
vacuumed tables? Because that is not what I am seeing.



--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Avoiding-Refreezing-XIDs-Repeatedly-tp5837222p5837247.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: David G Johnston
Date:
Subject: Re: Migrating a FoxPro system and would like input on the best way to achieve optimal performance
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoiding Refreezing XIDs Repeatedly