On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Joe Abbate <jma@freedomcircle.com> wrote:
> On 30/08/12 17:36, Tom Lane wrote:
>> FWIW, that suggests that this version of jade is too old. I'm not sure
>> that jade per se (as opposed to the successor project openjade) can be
>> used to build our docs at all --- you should check whether this is
>> openjade, or really the original project.
>
> It was the old jade. After I installed openjade, as suggested by Alvaro
> and Jeff Janes, and re-ran ./configure the invocation line changed to
> use openjade.
>
so, now the question is: should we accept jade at all in configure? or
should we fail after not finding jade and report why?
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
