Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements
Date
Msg-id CAJKUy5h74BddLLG6q6FZ3ZpmEdCE9g6cEoPfxtt-vWA7QGN+xA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Joe Abbate <jma@freedomcircle.com> wrote:
>> On 30/08/12 17:36, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> FWIW, that suggests that this version of jade is too old.  I'm not sure
>>> that jade per se (as opposed to the successor project openjade) can be
>>> used to build our docs at all --- you should check whether this is
>>> openjade, or really the original project.
>>
>> It was the old jade.  After I installed openjade, as suggested by Alvaro
>> and Jeff Janes, and re-ran ./configure the invocation line changed to
>> use openjade.
>>
>
> so, now the question is: should we accept jade at all in configure? or
> should we fail after not finding jade and report why?
>

the last one should read "openjade" ;)


--
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements