Re: Syntax for partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: Syntax for partitioning
Date
Msg-id CAJKUy5g-d_UiOUiLCp-GmyX6DVxAbiSNPopxJh4=2M6N5G0-yw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Syntax for partitioning  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
Responses Re: Syntax for partitioning
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>
> So will this be revived any time soon?  Were there any subsequent
> proposals which were posted?
>

there was an updated patch, you can find in this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20100114181323.9A33.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp

not sure what happens after that.

--
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: a modest improvement to get_object_address()
Next
From: Nikhil Sontakke
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrent CREATE TABLE/DROP SCHEMA leaves inconsistent leftovers