Re: Syntax for partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: Syntax for partitioning
Date
Msg-id CAA-aLv63cdsX=8G9KgpYxeaJKyqb8BL8t-shhSHx1A-8X36+BQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Syntax for partitioning  (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
Responses Re: Syntax for partitioning
List pgsql-hackers
On 15 December 2009 02:31, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 09:00 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 11:54 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
>>> > Here is an update partitioning syntax patch.
>>> >
>>> > A bug reported by Marko is fixed.
>>>
>>> I will review and eventually commit this, if appropriate, though it is
>>> 3rd in my queue and will probably not be done for at least 2 weeks,
>>> possibly 4 weeks.
>>
>> I'll have to go back on this unfortunately, sorry about that.
>>
>
> the next patch for this will arrive in the next commitfest so maybe
> you have more time then

So will this be revived any time soon?  Were there any subsequent
proposals which were posted?

-- 
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: a modest improvement to get_object_address()
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: In COPY, insert tuples to the heap in batches.