Hi,
> While rebasing a patch from 2016 related to sequence AMs (more about
> that later), I've bumped on a mistake from 8586bf7ed888 in
> opr_sanity.sql, as of:
> +SELECT p1.oid, p1.amname, p2.oid, p2.proname
> +FROM pg_am AS p1, pg_proc AS p2
> +WHERE p2.oid = p1.amhandler AND p1.amtype = 's' AND
Good catch.
> It seems to me that this has been copy-pasted on HEAD from the
> sequence AM patch, but forgot to update amtype to 't'. While that's
> maybe cosmetic, I think that this could lead to unexpected results, so
> perhaps there is a point in doing a backpatch?
I disagree that it's cosmetic. The test doesn't check what it's supposed to.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
