Hello Tom,
Thank you for your reply,
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> This is not a bug. There are any number of changes you could make that
> would affect either plan selection or row ordering (which usually means
> the same thing) in the regression tests; block size is one, and there
> are a lot of more-easily-varied GUC settings as well. It was pure luck
> if you didn't see such an issue in some specific prior release.
didn't know about that; plus this is followed by lots of sql errors, I
was quite surprised to get zero error in 9.1 and so much in 9.2.
Thanks,
--
William
