Re: Distinguish publication exclusions in object addresses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: Distinguish publication exclusions in object addresses
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PvHqqY2NTctAz9eFf73kepT9cdYsVUAbCe7A+6HVmLtKg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Distinguish publication exclusions in object addresses  (Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Distinguish publication exclusions in object addresses
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 4:46 PM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 16, 2026, at 13:50, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > --
> > With Regards,
> > Amit Kapila.
> > <v4-0001-Distinguish-publication-exclusions-in-object-addr.patch>
>
> V4 overall looks sold to me. Just a couple of small comments:
>
> 1
> ```
> -- No entry of either kind.  testpub_default publishes nothing.
> SELECT pg_get_object_address('publication excluded relation',
>                              '{public, testpub_tbl1}', '{testpub_default}');
> ERROR:  publication relation "testpub_tbl1" in publication "testpub_default" does not exist
> ```
>
> For this new test, the error message is a little surprising to me. Since the requested object type is "publication
excludedrelation", I would expect the error message to say something like: 
> ```
> publication excluded relation "testpub_tbl1" in publication "testpub_default" does not exist
> ```

+1 this because maybe the reported table name really *does* exist and
is part of the publication, even though the message is saying the
exact opposite.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: solai v
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CANONICAL option to xmlserialize
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: pg_createsubscriber does not check output_plugin_libraries