Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAHut+PuwnfQ=WHim-DacNf1nnv-pVnc3oh9AZw-CkirZoNPXUw@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>) |
Responses |
RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
Here are a few more review comments for patch v3-0001. ====== doc/src/sgml/ref/pgupgrade.sgml 1. + <varlistentry> + <term><option>--include-logical-replication-slots</option></term> + <listitem> + <para> + Upgrade logical replication slots. Only permanent replication slots + included. Note that pg_upgrade does not check the installation of + plugins. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> Missing word. "Only permanent replication slots included." --> "Only permanent replication slots are included." ====== src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c 2. help @@ -1119,6 +1145,8 @@ help(const char *progname) printf(_(" --no-unlogged-table-data do not dump unlogged table data\n")); printf(_(" --on-conflict-do-nothing add ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING to INSERT commands\n")); printf(_(" --quote-all-identifiers quote all identifiers, even if not key words\n")); + printf(_(" --logical-replication-slots-only\n" + " dump only logical replication slots, no schema or data\n")); printf(_(" --rows-per-insert=NROWS number of rows per INSERT; implies --inserts\n")); A previous review comment ([1] #11b) seems to have been missed. This help is misplaced. It should be in alphabetical order consistent with all the other help. ====== src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.h 3. _LogicalReplicationSlotInfo +/* + * The LogicalReplicationSlotInfo struct is used to represent replication + * slots. + * XXX: add more attrbutes if needed + */ +typedef struct _LogicalReplicationSlotInfo +{ + DumpableObject dobj; + char *plugin; + char *slottype; + char *twophase; +} LogicalReplicationSlotInfo; + 4a. The indent of the 'LogicalReplicationSlotInfo' looks a bit strange, unlike others in this file. Is it OK? ~ 4b. There was no typedefs.list file in this patch. Maybe the above whitespace problem is a result of that omission. ====== .../pg_upgrade/t/003_logical_replication.pl 5. +# Run pg_upgrade. pg_upgrade_output.d is removed at the end +command_ok( + [ + 'pg_upgrade', '--no-sync', + '-d', $old_publisher->data_dir, + '-D', $new_publisher->data_dir, + '-b', $bindir, + '-B', $bindir, + '-s', $new_publisher->host, + '-p', $old_publisher->port, + '-P', $new_publisher->port, + $mode, '--include-logical-replication-slot' + ], + 'run of pg_upgrade for new publisher'); 5a. How can this test even be working as-expected with those options? Here it is passing option '--include-logical-replication-slot' but AFAIK the proper option name everywhere else in this patch is '--include-logical-replication-slots' (with the 's') ~ 5b. I'm not sure that "pg_upgrade for new publisher" makes sense. It's more like "pg_upgrade of old publisher", or simply "pg_upgrade of publisher" ------ [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/TYCPR01MB5870E212F5012FD6272CE1E3F5969%40TYCPR01MB5870.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
pgsql-hackers by date: