At Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:17:46 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 05:25:46PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > Wouldn't storing the value in the shared memory itself work? Though,
> > that space does become almost dead for the server's lifetime...
>
> Sure, it would work. However, we'd still need an interface for the
> extra function. At this point, a GUC with an unknown state is kind of
> OK for me. Anyway, where would you stick this state?
(Digging memory..)
Sorry for confusion but I didn't mean to stick to the function. Just
I thought that some people seem to dislike having the third state for
the should-be-boolean variable.
So, I'm okay with GUC, having "unknown".
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
