Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 2:50 AM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 6:17 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > While revisiting some old threads, I found this one that seemed to
> > reach a conclusion, but then it seemed nothing happened.
> >
> > After multiple suggestions AFAICT James preferred the docs [1]
> > modification suggested [2] by Laurenz.
> >
> > Should we make a CF entry for this with the status RfC, or was the
> > whole thing abandoned for some reason?
> >
> > ======
> > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/logical-replication-publication.html
> > [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAaqYe91iO3dfUnVmBs4M-4aUX_zHmPN72ELE7c_8qAO_toPmA%40mail.gmail.com
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Peter Smith.
> > Fujitsu Australia
>
> Yes, I would appreciate it moving forward.
>
> Did you want to create the CF entry or should I?
>

I did it. See here: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/51/5445/ marked
it as Ready for Committer.

I was unsure whether to record the author as you (the thread author)
or as Laurenz (the favoured patch author) so I just left some fields
blank.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia