Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Coleman
Subject Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING
Date
Msg-id CAAaqYe9NzWBZTZ04aavj2Uow+3b3cC8Qa-r1n8jOqZ8sv5CVYQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 6:17 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> While revisiting some old threads, I found this one that seemed to
> reach a conclusion, but then it seemed nothing happened.
>
> After multiple suggestions AFAICT James preferred the docs [1]
> modification suggested [2] by Laurenz.
>
> Should we make a CF entry for this with the status RfC, or was the
> whole thing abandoned for some reason?
>
> ======
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/logical-replication-publication.html
> [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAaqYe91iO3dfUnVmBs4M-4aUX_zHmPN72ELE7c_8qAO_toPmA%40mail.gmail.com
>
> Kind Regards,
> Peter Smith.
> Fujitsu Australia

Yes, I would appreciate it moving forward.

Did you want to create the CF entry or should I?

Regards,
James Coleman



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Karlsson
Date:
Subject: Re: fixing tsearch locale support
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Maybe we should reduce SKIP_PAGES_THRESHOLD a bit?