Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PuVe2YEWwhjOd1u8Ee_CEvrFkvYV87LwFdieoz+V+Tm8w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 3:49 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:11 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > 3.
> > There is inconsistent wording for what seems to be the same condition.
> > e.g.1 The existing documentation [2] says "Xid of the transaction. The
> > XID is sent only when user has requested streaming of in-progress
> > transactions."
> > e.g.2 For a similar case the patch says "Xid of the transaction (only
> > present for streamed transactions)."
> > I think there should be consistent wording used on this page where possible.
> >
>
> I think this is already modified as below in the patch. Is there any
> other place you are referring to?

No. My mistake. Sorry for the false alarm.

------
KInd Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions not dumped when --schema is used